Which of the following options is NOT a benefit of using an in-memory database like SAP HANA?

Using an in-memory database like SAP HANA offers a range of benefits that greatly enhance data processing capabilities. Faster data retrieval times are a significant advantage because data is stored in RAM rather than on traditional disk storage, allowing for much quicker access. Furthermore, the real-time analytics capabilities that in-memory databases provide enable organizations to analyze large volumes of data instantly, facilitating better decision-making and timely insights.

Improved transaction processing speed is another key benefit of in-memory technology. Since transactions can be processed without the delays typically associated with disk I/O, the overall performance of applications that rely on database transactions is enhanced, allowing for more efficient operations.

In contrast, decreased hardware costs is not necessarily a benefit directly associated with in-memory databases. While the performance gains from using in-memory databases may lead organizations to reconsider their hardware investments, the initial setup costs for RAM can often be higher than traditional disk-based storage systems. This means that while using an in-memory database can improve performance, it doesn't inherently reduce hardware costs, especially if the organization requires a significant amount of memory to accommodate its data needs. Thus, this option stands out as not being a benefit of using an in-memory database like SAP HANA.